Skip to main content

e-Li: Electronic Library

Depreciation Methods and Rates

Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of tangible property over a period of  time, rather then deducting the cost as an expense in the year of acquisition. Typically at the end of an asset’s useful life the sum of the amount charged for depreciation will equal original cost less salvage value (if any). GASB Statement 34 allows a county to use any established rational and systematic method of  depreciation. This includes such methods as straight-line, sum-of-the-years digits, double-declining balance, and declining balance. The use of straight-line depreciation—the most widely used and simplest method for calculating  depreciation—is highly recommended.

Under the straight-line depreciation method, the basis of an asset is written off evenly over the useful life of the asset. The same amount of depreciation is taken each year of the asset’s useful life. In order to identify the annual depreciation expense for an asset using straight-line deprecation, the total cost of an asset (less  the salvage value) is divided by the asset’s useful life.

Example of straight-line depreciation:

Original cost $10,000
Salvage value 500
Adjusted basis $ 9,500
Estimated life 5
Depreciation per year $1,900

 

Salvage Value
The salvage value of an asset is an estimate made by management of what the value of an asset will be at the end of its useful life. The GASB allows county management  to determine salvage value from general guidelines from professional organizations such as the Government Finance Officers Association, information from other governments, professionals such as engineers, and by internal experience of what an asset is worth at the end of its useful life. Using the assumption that many counties in Tennessee tend to use capital assets until they are literally worthless, a county could assign a salvage value of zero (0) to its capital assets  to help streamline recordkeeping. The CTAS sample capital asset policy uses this  assumption.

Averaging Conventions
In order for management to avoid the complications of depreciating individual assets from the specific date that the asset was placed in service, GAAP supports the adoption of guidelines that assume assets are placed in service or disposed of at  designated times of the year. These guidelines are known as averaging conventions. There are several types of averaging conventions (mid-quarter, half-year, modified  half-year, etc.); however, it is highly recommended that counties adopt the full-month averaging convention. By using the full-month averaging convention, property placed into service at any time during a given month is treated as if it were placed in service at the first day of that month, regardless of the actual day of the  month acquired. Likewise, when the asset is disposed of, the actual date of disposal is disregarded and the disposal date is the end of the month prior to the month of disposal (i.e. no depreciation is taken for the month of disposal).

Useful lives of assets
An asset’s useful life can be defined as the estimated number of months or years that an asset will be able to be used for the purpose for which it was acquired. GASB  does not recommend any specific useful life schedule, but recommends several  sources for a county to estimate the useful lives of their assets. These sources  include general guidelines from professional organizations, information for  comparable assets from other county governments, and internal experience. Counties should not merely copy the useful life schedule of another county as conditions and asset usage may differsignificantly from county to county.

Example:
Gray County assigns a useful life of six years to all sheriff pursuit cars. Blue County, which is located next to Gray County, is in the process of attempting to comply with GASB 34 and copies Gray County’s useful life schedule without any modification.  Blue County’s management does not take into consideration that their county has rougher terrain and is three times larger than Gray County, meaning Blue County’s deputies will drive their vehicles more and in rougher conditions than Gray County’s deputies. After three years, as is typical in Blue County, the police cruisers are worn out and are taken out of service, even though on paper the vehicles should have three years of useful life left. Because of the inaccurate useful life estimate, Blue County could recognize a significant loss on the disposal of the vehicles.